At the same
time however employers often prefer to avoid relocation both because it
suggests that there are problems with the domestic business environment and
because of its complexity and the uncertainty of its outcomes. They then argue
that the competitiveness and attractiveness of domestic economic should be
promoted by interventions that reduce or eliminate the need for relocations.
help full link
Different organizations emphasize different types of interventions generally
however they include. Neoliberal interventions such as labour market
deregulation tax reduction reduced social contributions and welfare state
reforms. Supportive industrial and innovation policies. Industrial- relations
related initiatives aimed at ensuring wage moderation and supporting firms competitiveness
and work flexibility.
Employers
don’t question relocation as a company strategy. Rather they focus on the
reasons behind relocation and on ways to address these with a view to reducing
the perceived need for relocation.
Packers and Movers in Japan
In Japan the
Japan business Federation Nippon Keidanren employer confederation takes a very
similar position on the need for unconstrained relocation where firms see fit.
It maintains that individual companies need to relocate overseas to cut costs
and thereby strengthen their international competitiveness. It also stresses a
perceived wider benefit little mentioned in Europe. Arguing that relocation
provides a form of international contribution through the technology transfer
and job creation that occur as a result. At the same time like many of its
European counterparts, Nippon Keidanren wants to ensure that domestic industry
remains strong and competitive not least on employment grounds.
In a recent
document entitled Issues and outlook for strengthening industry it states. We
consider that some reduction in employment in the manufacturing industry is
unavoidable but in order to avoid a sudden hollowing- out of employment it is
necessary to enhance industrial strength and secure domestic manufacturing bases
within Japan.
Packers and Movers in USA
In the USA
employers views are similar to those in the EU. They generally see relocation
as a way to improve profit margins and/or survive in an ever more competitive
global economy. They regard their actions as helpful to the US economy overall,
although unfortunate for redundant workers and the communities affected in the
short term.
Any pandering to protectionism which is essentially dismissed by
employers in all the countries examined or regulation of companies actions will
employers maintain, inflict severe damage on the US economy and impede
processes of renewal and growth. Some manufacturers are noticeably less
comfortable with relocation as an option.
No comments:
Post a Comment